AccountabilityA bureaucracy lacks direct accountability to stakeholders such as the public, taxpayers, customers, employees and donors. For example, a government department that is run by administrators as opposed to elected officials. Such a department may ultimately answer to elected officials providing some level of indirect accountability to the society or community they serve.
OversightA bureaucracy may be monitored and governed by an oversight body that accepts complaints from stakeholders. This may provide some level of accountability if the oversight body has fully authority to remove leadership and takes an active and adversarial stance.
Professional CompetenceThe primary characteristic of a bureaucracy is that it is a system of formal authority based on competency. In a bureaucracy, you are promoted when a system deems you competent. This can be contrasted with formal authority granted by an election, meritocracy, family membership, social connections or revolution.
StabilityA bureaucracy provides stability as compared with an elected office. This may be efficient as compared to a system where strategy can completely reverse with every election. meritocracy that is based on results and potential. For example, a brilliant young engineer with exceptional creative talents, high personal resilience and well developed influencing abilities would tend to rise much faster in a meritocratic organization.
Not My JobDue to the highly specialized division of labor in a bureaucracy, they may develop a culture of "not my job" whereby employees are primarily concerned with clearing issues from their specific area with little concern for the success or failure of programs, projects and operations.
FormalityBureaucracies value formality including policy, procedure, rules and processes.
AutomationDue to their embrace of formal processes, bureaucracies embrace automation and attempt to systemize everything.
TechnocracyA technocracy is a bureaucracy that is dominated by technologists and focused on automation. This has become so common that it is essentially a more modern term for bureaucracy.black and white thinking whereby they don't make exceptions even when it makes sense. This is a form of logic known as excluded middle that deals with true or false as opposed to degrees of truth.
HierarchyBureaucracies are organized into hierarchies based on formal authority. Informal authority plays little or no role in decision making and strategy.
ChangeBureaucracies tend to be slow to change and are prone to defense of the status quo. They might implement change on long road maps of 5 years or more where a small commercial entity would execute the same change in a month.
Big ThinkingDue to a preference for long term planning, bureaucracies are prone to developing huge projects as opposed to quick incremental changes.overthink, overplan and overanalyze every problem and opportunity.
Organizational MaturityBureaucracies are often organizationally mature such that they pour significant resources into managing compliance, risk and quality. They attempt to follow every standard and best practice they can find.
Employee EntrenchmentMost bureaucracies have relatively high job security whereby it is uncommon for employees to be terminated. It may also be uncommon for employees to leave. This leads to a static culture whereby employees may remain entrenched in a position for many years.
Red TapeRed tape is a high level of administrative burden. Bureaucracies are known for their red tape. This extends from other characteristics of a bureaucracy such as overthinking, formality and a lack of accountability to stakeholders.
Petty AuthorityPetty authority is the use of formal authority to enjoy a sense of personal power. For example, the use of authority to punish others to enjoy a feeling of social dominance. This may be common in bureaucracies due to their reliance on formal authority over informal authority.
Malicious ComplianceMalicious compliance is the irrational application of formal rules and processes that has negative motivations. This may be common in bureaucracies due to the powerlessness of employees who lack formal authority such that discover ways to use the system against itself.
EfficiencyBureaucracies are commonly perceived as being inefficient but this isn't always the case. Bureaucracies promote only experts, automate things and adhere to formal processes. This can theoretically be efficient. However, without oversight and accountability a bureaucracy may simply become efficient at making life miserable.
An administrative system run by unelected officials.
A system of strict formal authority where authority is assigned based on professional competence.
StableProfessional competenceHigh organizational maturityEfficient where there is sufficient oversight