Power distance is the degree to which a society accepts that power is distributed unequally. This is considered a foundational element of society that explains broad differences between nations and cultures. The following are illustrative examples of power distance.
High power distance is associated with hierarchical organizations with a strict command and control structure. Low power distance tends to lead to flatter organizations with authority distributed to many individuals.High power distance is associated with concentrated decision making whereby leaders don't ask for the opinions of subordinates and subordinates rarely challenge leadership decisions.
In a low power distance setting, leaders carefully communicate their plans to seek acceptance and engagement from the group. People feel relatively free to challenge the strategy and ideas of leadership. In a high power distance setting, it may be unthinkable to challenge a superior.
IndependencePeople at the bottom of a low power distance organization or society have relative independence from their leaders. For example, knowledge workers who have significant freedom to practice their profession as they see fit as long as they achieve a set of objectives. In a high power distance setting, people at the bottom are carefully controlled and monitored.
Where power distance is high, people may expect leaders to provide specific direction and become upset when faced with significant ambiguity.
MeritLow power distance requires individuals to justify a superior position with their merit. Competition may be intense with everyone believing they can lead. If power distance is extremely low not even merit may be enough to justify more power with power distributed evenly in the name of equalness regardless of incompetence. In a high power distance setting, power may be easily distributed to friends, family and allies without much of a challenge.
Low power distance demands accountability of leaders. High power distance may result in a lack of accountability such that ethical lapses go unpunished.
CharityIn a high power distance country, those who need help from society may be viewed as weak and lazy while the elite view themselves as superior and worthy of luxuries. As such, high power distance may lead to a lack of charity and social infrastructure.
ClassesGenerally speaking, low power distance is associated with a large middle class whereby many people are at a similar level of society. High power distance is associated with a large gap between the poor and the wealthy with little in between.
PaternalismHigh power distance may result in a paternalistic society whereby governments and/or firms regular and control many aspects of life in the "best interests" of the individual. This comes with the implicit assumption that people are unable to act in their own best interests and those of their family.
NotesMalaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Russia and China are examples of high power distance countries with scores between 80 and 100.New Zealand, Denmark, Norway, United Kingdom and Germany have low power distance scores between 18 and 35.The United States, Canada and Japan have somewhat low power distance scores between 39 and 54.
This is the complete list of articles we have written about society.
If you enjoyed this page, please consider bookmarking Simplicable.
ReferencesHofstede, Geert. "Cultural constraints in management theories." Academy of Management Perspectives 7.1 (1993): 81-94.Hofstede, Geert, and Michael H. Bond. "Hofstede's culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach's value survey." Journal of cross-cultural psychology 15.4 (1984): 417-433.Dorfman, Peter W., and Jon P. Howell. "Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited." Advances in international comparative management 3.1 (1988): 127-150.
© 2010-2023 Simplicable. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of materials found on this site, in any form, without explicit permission is prohibited.
View credits & copyrights or citation information for this page.